Read more: http://www.bloggerdersleri.com/2012/06/blogger-meta-tag-ayarlari.html#ixzz3CwTYFEk2 şöyle garip bencileyin: 2025 Follow my blog with Bloglovin

2 Ağustos 2025 Cumartesi

Celebrities Who Carry the Flag of Immorality at the Forefront

 

     Since the 20th century, new communication tools have made it possible for events on the other side of the world to enter our lives in a very short amount of time. People "updated" themselves and quickly adapted to these changes, which led to a situation where we started hearing the names of well-known "celebrities." In particular, representatives of fields like cinema and music (and sometimes fashion and "contemporary art") were pushed into our eyes and ears through television and radio. This brought with it an ever-increasing number of fan bases for certain celebrities. Especially young people, who admire their voices, stage presence, acting skills, and success in their fields—and, of course, their "handsome" or "beautiful" looks—started to let these celebrities into their private lives and, as if enchanted, began to follow them.

     Of course, this kind of blind love and imitation also produced a great danger. Some of those brilliant actors and magnificent singers could be immoral in their private lives. In many areas, from substance abuse to various sexual orientations, they didn't present a profile that one should follow. What was even stranger, and more sobering was that the mass media would promote those who were the most immoral, showed the most perversion, and were the most brazen in talking about and showing their vulgarities, trying to push them even more into the eyes of young people. Under the guise of combating the "AIDS plague," which is more common among those who have perverted relationships and for which there is still no cure, activities that were made to look "innocent" have gone so far as to popularize the perversion of LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) as a "legitimate human right" with widespread public support.

     In connection with this, events such as the legalization of same-sex marriage in so-called "developed" countries, the ability for same-sex couples to be married in churches, the praising of LGBT advocates with gilded words as "unrelenting human rights defenders," and the great respect given to members of parliament and opinion leaders whose gender is unknown are increasing as part of the relentlessly pumped-up disinformation. On the other hand, those who stand against these shameless people and try to prevent them from setting a bad example are labeled as homophobic, reactionary, or close-minded by the same media and are tried to be isolated.

     Therefore, let's give a few names of people who were the most audacious in immorality, insolence, and illegitimate acts and relationships, and who, of course, were the worst examples for the young people who followed them.

     Freddie Mercury: One of the most immoral figures in recent history. He was adored by millions of young people, and his early death has been exaggerated more and more. He had countless relationships with men during completely out-of-control, drug-fueled party nights and finally contracted AIDS, which is more commonly found in homosexuals and those who are prone to illegitimate relationships, and died from it. He is one of the leading characters that Western immoral people try to use to trap young Muslims. Because when you describe this guy as a "great artist" or something, you are opening the door to AIDS, homosexuality, and all kinds of immorality. As for his religion, he was a Zoroastrian (a religion of fire worshippers fabricated by Zoroaster). When he died, his body was burned. He was a product of Britain! Had he lived a little longer, it wouldn't have been a stretch for him to get the "Sir" title from the Queen! Now that his movie has been released, he will probably be completely taboo and made into a saint.

Freddie Mercury with his lover
Jim Hutton


     Salvador Dali: The first person who comes to mind when you say "surrealism." With his strange poses for the cameras, his upward-pointing mustache, the paintings he drew, the scripts he wrote, the illegitimate and "perverted" relationships that were very common with people he brought to his wife's house despite being married, his homosexual tendencies, his arrogance, and his inclination towards sadomasochism... In short, with all those unusual things he did to become famous, he was one of those who corrupted the 20th century and started the moral erosion. His buddy Luis Bunuel was also a prime example.

     Rock Hudson: A person who wrote letters to the men he was with, saying, "We were together, and my doctor tells me I may have contracted AIDS. Please go to your doctor and get yourself checked." One of the men he had a relationship with sued him after his death, claiming he had a relationship with him for months even though he knew he had "AIDS." The court ruled in his favor and awarded him compensation. He is the person who paved the way for concepts like "AIDS" and "homosexuality" to be discussed more freely, as if they were ordinary things. Because after his death, such immoralities and, more painfully, the acts of openly doing and announcing such immoralities began to get out of control. He was a member of the Church of Scientology.

     Rudolf Nureyev: One of the immoral people who is tried to be kept on the agenda as "one of the greatest dancers." He was an open pervert who had countless illegitimate relationships and was declared a "hero" by some circles just because he openly talked about his perverted relationships. He was born into a Tatar family during the Soviet Union, and as the saying goes, "the water jug breaks on the way to the water," he died because of AIDS. Despite coming from a Muslim family, he became an Orthodox Christian.

    Madonna: With her life, her songs, her illegitimate relationships, and what she does on stage, she is one of the leading carriers of the flag of immorality who manages to occupy the agenda in some way. She is praised for fighting the supposedly imaginary monster called "homophobia." She is the standard-bearer of the movements called LGBT. And, unfortunately, such people are applauded as "Human Rights activists." When this woman was just trying to enter the market, a manager she met with praised her, saying, "I thought I was looking at a prostitute." Naturally, she is also distant from monotheistic religions.

     Woody Allen: An American director and screenwriter of Jewish descent. He is known for his brazen films about male-female relationships. In his films, illegitimate relationships are as common as bread and butter, and no moral or spiritual standards are recognized. Claims that he sexually abused his adopted daughter have become public knowledge. Despite being Jewish, he defines himself as an Agnostic.

     Michel Foucault: A homosexual pervert who died of AIDS-related causes. An atheist philosopher that immoral, anti-religious circles never get tired of praising. When people who pretend to be "intellectuals" mention his name, they almost change dimensions!

     Charlie Chaplin: One of the unrivaled actors of the "Silent Cinema" era. He had illegitimate relationships with what is said to be thousands of women. The kind, helpful personality of the black-and-white films was an immoral man who raped young girls and then forced the victims to have abortions. Those who know his private life a little say that he approached every female being who knocked on his door with the thought of "how can I get her into bed." He was British and an atheist. He was the "Harvey Weinstein" before Harvey Weinstein! In fact, he himself said, "Chaplin is my idol."

     Sigmund Freud: One of the most despicable perverts in history, adored by the atheist, anti-religious crowd. He came from a Jewish family but became an atheist. He supposedly subjected things that a normal person would be disgusted to even think about to psychoanalysis and put them in his books, writing unbelievable nonsense about babies and small children. Most of what he said arouses disgust in people with a slight moral backbone. He shows what the West, which was trying to escape from corrupted Christianity, can become without religion and morality.

     David Bowie: One more of the immoral people who are exaggerated more and more. Like almost every "influential" Briton, he was inclined to homosexuality and bisexuality. With what he did and what he was, he tried to lead astray young people who still had some fragments of morality and religion. He wandered between Atheism and Agnosticism.

     Stephen Fry: Here's another British atheist, and his mother was Jewish! He married a man much younger than himself! He accuses those who look at the group called LGBT with a side-eye of being barbarians and Nazis. He used drugs for years.

     Mick Jagger: David Bowie's buddy! He has one more thing than him, and that's the "Sir" title. The rest is almost the same.

     John Lennon: A British man with distorted religious views and a foggy mind. In his song "Imagine," which is praised to the skies, he imagines that the world would be a more livable place without religion and that people would live in peace. To understand how idiotic he was, it is enough to look at the lyrics of this song.

     Iggy Pop: A drug-addicted, foul-mouthed rocker who usually appeared on stage semi-naked. In his youth, he committed all kinds of obscenities on stage.

     Elton John: British, atheist, and homosexual... Oh, we forgot, the guy is "Sir," by the way! The allegations about him are unbelievable.

     Andy Warhol: One of the devil's soldiers who worked to lead young people astray and spread immorality with everything from his sexual orientation and beliefs to what he called art and his private life! In some circles, to be known as an "intellectual," you have to like and appreciate what this despicable guy did! Imagine an even more extreme version of Bedri Baykam!

     George Michael: British atheist and homosexual singer. He died in a state of depression from drug and alcohol addiction, chasing one-night stands. One of the men he slept with also died of AIDS.

     As can be seen, when you look at just a few of these well-known names, it seems easier for British citizens or those who have passed through the "British mold" to be included in this list. In addition, those who are homosexual, atheist, brazen, and "vociferous" enough to build public opinion have the potential to write their names in history with golden letters!

     Those who say, "But sir, aren't you attacking these people too much? Are you so pure?" should take this into consideration: The main issue is not that the targeted people had perverted relationships or did very terrible things in their private lives. The main problem is that they did these illegitimate things in public, that they did them in front of everyone in a way that would corrupt the morality of societies, and that they even took pride in them and defended their actions.

31 Temmuz 2025 Perşembe

The White Lotus and the Aesthetic State of Moral Decay: Where is Western Civilization Heading?

 Introduction: The Emptiness Behind Luxury

     HBO’s much-discussed series, The White Lotus, might initially seem like a production that blends humor and drama, focusing on the holidays of the wealthy. Each season of this show, set in a tropical hotel, offers a window into the inner world of Western elites vacationing in different geographical locations. However, this window points not only to individual tragedies but also to the wholesale moral decay of a civilization.

Mike White


     The series exposes the current state of the West through themes such as infidelity, manipulation of gender roles, the disintegration of family structure, homosexuality, and consumer culture. In this article, we will center on The White Lotus to argue that the West's so-called "civilizing" process actually corrupts individuals and alienates them from their innate nature. From our perspective, we will trace the path of this decline.


1. Did You Say Marriage and Family?

     Perhaps the most striking aspect of the series is how the infidelity of married characters is portrayed as almost commonplace. In every season, secret affairs, fleeting desires, and betrayals among married characters become one of the fundamental dynamics of the show. Modern Western culture depicts a scenario where moral boundaries are increasingly blurred under the guise of "personal freedom," and sacred bonds like marriage are easily sacrificed for individual desires. So-called philosophical approaches and numerous other gilded arguments circulate among "highly educated" spouses, seeking to find an excuse for everything. In marriages where women pursue careers, men are utterly miserable! As for children, as they transition from "autonomy" to complete freedom, their purely material ties with their families, devoid of any spiritual connection, become increasingly evident. Children make no effort to obey their parents and, being deprived of maternal upbringing, they become "acclimated" to all the immoralities they will encounter in their future lives from a young age! The lack of warmth and intimacy between spouses is also clearly reflected in their relationships with their children.

     Therefore, the West's concept of "marriage" is entirely superficial, shallow, devoid of any depth, often based on self-interest, pragmatic, and a cold contract. It lacks the virtues and mission of protecting parties and new generations from evil and immorality or establishing a warm home!


2. The Normalization and Imposition of Homosexuality

     The second season of The White Lotus is particularly noteworthy for highlighting homosexual characters' relationships. This situation is not merely a matter of representation but a continuous message to the viewer that "this is also normal." These relationships are no longer just shown in series; they are also glorified and presented as deeper and more meaningful than heterosexual relationships. Indeed, some series and cinema viewing platforms have been intensely engaged in LGBT propaganda and agenda for several years now, constantly confronting us. Perverted characters, completely irrelevant and adding nothing to the main story, are forced upon the audience. The disgraceful cancel culture, which aims to tarnish anyone and any movement that doesn't conform to its views, spares no effort in fanning the flames!


3. The Devaluation of Masculinity and Femininity

     Male characters in the series are often in passive, weak, or guilty positions. Female characters, on the other hand, are either manipulative or figures who push the boundaries of being "strong." They may be at the peak of their academic careers or in enviable professional positions. The submissive husband, meanwhile, is either secretly cheating on his wife, tired of her nagging and scolding, or sits like a cat with its tail between its legs, hatching various schemes! In this regard, the series demonstrates how gender roles in the West have been overturned, and new models contrary to nature are being imposed.


4. Consumption, Hedonism, Nafs, Arrogance, and Emptiness

     Almost all characters in the series are financially wealthy and live in prosperity. However, this prosperity does not make them happy. Restlessness, loneliness, insecurity, endless doubts stemming from intellectual arrogance, and a sense of meaninglessness are common denominators for almost all characters. Money, all kinds of pleasure, travel, luxury consumption... nothing satisfies them. And it cannot satisfy them because fulfilling the body's desires does little for spiritual relief.


5. Monogamy and the Drama of the Man

     One of the things imposed by the secular West is monogamy, which has been rare in history. In this respect, the series is also a mirror of the man's broken-winged, helpless state. When this is added to the problems listed above, the man's situation truly becomes pitiable. Or rather, all these issues are interconnected and effectively melt away the man, who should be the pillar of the family, from his rightful position! For when the woman he happened to marry, and for whom he, so to speak, spent his "one shot," turns into a cold shadow who shows him little interest and pursues a career or work, there is only one thing left for the man to do: cheat. The man who seeks solace in the arms of low women increasingly distances himself from his family as his guilt intensifies, or he becomes a hypocrite skilled in lying.


Conclusion: Whither the West?

     The White Lotus is a form of civilization critique that exposes the current state of the modern West. However, this critique offers neither a solution nor a path to salvation to the viewer. This is because the West's value system is built on rotten foundations. This system, increasingly cornered by continuous waves of migration, is far from being a balm for individuals caught in the grip of hedonism and selfishness. One wonders how much longer this temporary wealth, established after days of exploiting untouched geographies, will continue to radiate false and artificial smiles?!